1 edition of Nonmonotonic Logic found in the catalog.
This monograph provides a thorough analysis of two important formalisms for nonmonotonic reasoning: default logic and modal nonmonotonic logics. It is also shown how they are related to each other and how they provide the formal foundations for logic programming. The discussion is rigorous, and all main results are formally proved. Many of the results are deep and surprising, some of them previously unpublished. The book has three parts, on default logic, modal nonmonotonic logics, and connections and complexity issues, respectively. The study of general default logic is followed by a discussion of normal default logic and its connections to the closed world assumption, and also a presentation of related aspects of logic programming. The general theory of the family of modal nonmonotonic logics introduced by McDermott and Doyle is followed by studies of autoepistemic logic, the logic of reflexive knowledge, and the logic of pure necessitation, and also a short discussion of algorithms for computing knowledge and belief sets. The third part explores connections between default logic and modal nonmonotonic logics and contains results on the complexity of nonmonotonic reasoning. The ideas are presented with an elegance and unity of perspective that set a new standard of scholarship for books in this area, and the work indicates that the field has reached a very high level of maturity and sophistication. The book is intended as a reference on default logic, nonmonotonic logics, and related computational issues, and is addressed to researchers, programmers, and graduate students in the Artificial Intelligence community.
|Statement||by V. Wiktor Marek, Mirosław Truszczyński|
|Series||Artificial Intelligence, Artificial Intelligence|
|LC Classifications||Q334-342, TJ210.2-211.495|
|The Physical Object|
|Format||[electronic resource] :|
|Pagination||1 online resource (xiv, 420 p.)|
|Number of Pages||420|
|ISBN 10||3662029081, 3662029065|
|ISBN 10||9783662029084, 9783662029060|
These bridge systems, which are called 'paraclassical' logics, are very simple to define and easy to study. Specialists in nonmonotonic reasoning can also benefit from reading the chapters discussing the author's proposals. This information helps us design a better experience for all users. They alert us when OverDrive services are not working as expected.
The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules About this book When I first participated in exploring theories of nonmonotonic reasoning in the late s, I had no idea of the wealth of conceptual and mathematical results that would emerge from those halting first steps. The text shows that there are logics that act as natural bridges between classical consequence and the principal kinds of nonmonotonic logic to be found in the literature. Please review the types of cookies we use below. Then it considers ways of getting similar results by excluding certain classical valuations, and a third means to the same end, adding rules alongside the premises. Most notably, perhaps, is the requirement that the rule of or-introduction not be given free sway on outputs. On the one approach, in deference to vagueness, temporal or quantum indeterminacy or reference-failure, sentences that are classically non-bivalent are allowed as inputs and outputs to consequence relations.
three person solution
Domestic emergency plan
book of Revelation
Soviet economy, 1962
Resistance of materials laboratory manual.
Readings in Indian economic history
Bicentennial pictorial history of Volusia County
Small Java How To&Ess Pk (6th Edition)
Protecting intellectual property rights
Eat this not that!
Law of notices
The control of diarrhoea in clinical practice
essay on the law of patents for new inventions.
Art and nature. A comedy. As it is acted at the Theatre-Royal in Drury-Lane, ...
However, at this point, Nonmonotonic Reasoning starts throwing in some more unusual topics. Dialetheic logics allow certain selected sentences to have, as a third truth value, the classical values of truth and falsity together.
It provides recapitulations at the end of each chapter, exercises and problems, selected solutions to them, suggested projects, and guides to further reading. On the second, or non-monotonic, approach, constraints are placed on inputs and sometimes on outputs of a classical consequence relation, with a view to producing a notion of consequence that serves in a more realistic way the requirements of real-life inference.
Many-valued, dialetheic, fuzzy and quantum logics are, among other things, principled attempts to regulate the flow-through of sentences that are neither true nor false.
The book examines the three bridges one by one. It is particularly appropriate that Marek and Truszczynski should have authored this book, since so much of the research that went into these results is due to them. Dialetheic logics are a case in point.
Free shipping for individuals worldwide Usually dispatched within 3 to 5 business days. An abductive logic should not be monotonic because the most likely explanations are not necessarily correct. This information helps us design a better experience for all users.
Since the idea was first mooted around ,1 there has been a vast amount of work under the banner of nonmonotonic reasoning, and it is neither surprising nor unreasonable that Antoniou only covers part of the territory.
Nonmonotonic theorem proving; 4. Grigoris Antoniou's Nonmonotonic Reasoning is just such a milestone-well written, informative, and a good source of information on an important and complex subject.
Two final chapters serve to locate nonmonotonic reasoning in a wider landscape. Without these cookies, we won't know if you have any performance-related issues that we may be able to address. Research and analytics cookies These cookies help us understand user behavior within our services.
Non-bivalent inputs produce classically valid consequence statements, for any choice of outputs. Unlike some proof-theoretic formalizations that suffered from well-known paradoxes and were often hard to evaluate with respect of their consistency with the intuitions they were supposed to capture, model-theoretic formalizations were paradox-free and left little, if any, room for confusion about what non-monotonic patterns of reasoning they covered.
A logic for reasoning about knowledge is the autoepistemic logic. In the assumption that the new belief is correct, some of the old ones have to be retracted in order to maintain consistency.The purpose of this book is to take the mystery out of the subject, giving a clear overall picture of what is going on.
It makes the essential ideas and main approaches to nonmonotonic logic accessible, and meaningful, to anyone with a few basic tools of discrete mathematics and a minimal background in classical propositional logic.
Handbook of the History of Logic, Volume 8 book. Read reviews from world’s largest community for readers. The present volume of the Handbook of the Histo 4/5(1). Aug 13, · Read "The Many Valued and Nonmonotonic Turn in Logic" by available from Rakuten Kobo.
The present volume of the Handbook of the History of Logic brings together two of the most important developments in 20t. This book constitutes the refereed proceedings of the 5th Internationa l Conference on Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning, LPNMR '9 9, held in El Paso, Texas, USA, in December The volume presents 26 contributed papers and four invited talks, three appearing as exten ded Author: Michael Gelfond.
The relationship between nonmonotonic reasoning and logic is part of a larger story of the relations between AI and logic (see View chapter Purchase book. The Many Valued and Nonmonotonic Turn in Logic.
Grigoris Antoniou, Kewen Wang, in Handbook of the History of Logic, Legal Rules, Legal Reasoning, and Nonmonotonic Logic by Adam W. Rigoni A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Philosophy) in the University of Michigan Doctoral Committee: Professor Richmond H.
Thomason, Chair Professor Kevin D. Ashley, University of Pittsburgh.